M193 vs M855 vs .223 - Ballistics (2023)

Which of these rounds are worth a shot?

M193 vs M855 vs .223 - Ballistics (1)

There is a lot of confusion around these rounds: M193 vs M855 and then vs .223. Most folks realize the 5.56 NATO is synonymous with the U.S. M16A1 Rifle. Nowadays, numerous other firearms use the same cartridge but the iconic black rifle of the Vietnam era really kicked it off. And, like many other firearms destined for hard knocks, there were early teething pains.

The original 5.56mm load was designed for the 20-inch barrel of the earliest carry-handle M-16s. The system’s straight-line function and fast lightweight projectiles minimized recoil to improve control, especially during full-auto fire. The concept proved successful as long as the rifle actually worked but, long story short, sometimes it choked. Changes in the M16A2 and subsequent rifles included the now common forward assist, and a propellant less likely to produce fouling with that era’s lubricants.

Before we get into the article, know that there are numerous different cartridges/loads referenced. Below is a table outlining all of the loads to make it easier for the reader cost compare or gain more information on each:

5.56 XM855VariesBrownell’s, Guns.com, Lucky Gunner, Palmetto State Armory, Sportsman’s Guide, Sportsman’s Warehouse, Optics Planet
5.56 XM193VariesBrownell’s, Guns.com, Lucky Gunner, Palmetto State Armory, Sportsman’s Guide, Sportsman’s Warehouse, Optics Planet
.223 55 grain FMJFederal American EagleOptics Planet, Palmetto State Armory, Sportsman’s Guide
.223 55 grain Ballistic TipFederalOptics Planet, Sportsman’s Guide
55 grain GMX lead freeHornadySportsman’s Guide
55 grain Barnes TSXFederalOptics Planet, Sportsman’s Guide
60 grain Nosler Partition loadFederalOptics Planet, Palmetto State Armory, Sportsman’s Guide

If it’s primarily M855 vs M193 that you are looking for, see our Bulk Ammo Deals page for buying in larger quantities. It is updated weekly.

The 5.56 M193 Load

To begin the M855 vs M193 discussion we start with the M193, because that came first.

By the time I commenced an extended Southeast Asian vacation to Vietnam, the M16’s bugs had been worked out. It ran reliably with proper maintenance but, other than a powder switch, the cartridge itself was unchanged. Designated as M193 cartridge, it’s metrics work out to 5.56x45mm. The projectile was a .224 (.22-caliber) full metal jacket boattail, which weighed 55 grains. Muzzle velocity was listed at around 3160 feet per second (fps).

Lethality of this load was somewhat in question, misinformation aside. Cutting to the chase, the 5.56mm is darn close to the .222 Remington, which appeared in 1950 as varmint cartridge. It proved to be a huge success and also gained quick favor with benchrest shooters. The next evolution was the somewhat faster .222 Remington Magnum; a close relative of the military 5.56 cartridge.

(Video) What Is The Best 5.56 Round? (M193 vs M855 vs MK262)

Interestingly, Remington never pitched these calibers as big game loads. Their forte was always varmints like prairie dogs, woodchucks, or coyotes, etc. Same story for the .223 Remington; a civilian version of the 5.56 M193. Suddenly the expectation was the latter could neutralize two-legged threats. And, sometimes it did.

M193 vs M855 vs .223 - Ballistics (2)

M193 Bullet Stories vs Experience

Stories I heard involved everything from the mysterious new M16 bullet entering a knee and coming out an elbow, to the tumbling-bullet phenomenon. Firsthand experience was more educational. Beyond being .22-caliber, the bullet itself was fairly fragile, and soldiers carry lots of metal gear; pack-frames, canteens, entrenching tools, and magazines, etc. These items can disintegrate or deflect projectiles to strange angles. The tumbling effect, although real, was by no means guaranteed, and some wounds were straight pass-throughs. However, contact typically occurred at close range, accompanied by a barrage of full-auto bullets that could offset most deficiencies (we still call this “spray and pray”).

M193 Terminal Effects

As for terminal effects, it’s worth noting the effects of rifling, which spins bullets at truly awesome RPMs. Given the tremendous centrifugal force, it doesn’t take much to unravel a small, thin-skinned bullet!

M193 vs M855 vs .223 - Ballistics (3)

Of course, the main purpose of rifling is to spin a bullet on a stable axis. The original twist of 1:12 (one turn per foot) was deemed optimal for this purpose using 55-grain M193 Ball. Decades later I special-ordered a 24-inch HB AR15 with the same 1:12 twist for use with lightweight 40–55 grain varmint bullets. My main goal was accuracy, but larger critters and two-legged threats really require more clout – even if they’re not wearing steel helmets.

The 5.56 M855 Load

The 1980s saw a move toward standardization of NATO ammunition, concurrent with new or modernized small arms. U.S. forces saw adoption of a 9mm NATO pistol (the M-9 Beretta), and upgrades to the M16. Recognizing the shortcomings of the original 5.56 load, a heavier MK-855 “green tip” was adopted.

The 62-grain FMJ projectile incorporated a steel penetrator to help drill steel-hat threats out to 600 yards or so. Although starting slower at around 3000 fps, its extra mass did improve longer range performance. Some lump accuracy into this “improvement,” but it’s a bit more complicated than that.

Just about all of the bullet makers struggle to achieve stellar accuracy from composite-core bullets. Concentric inserts are difficult to produce and it only takes a tiny deviation to impart downrange yaw. Composites are also longer than standard lead core bullets, so like other long or heavy-for-caliber projectiles, they require faster rifling to stabilize. To address these issues, a much quicker 1:7 twist was adopted.

What is the M855 Good For?

Despite its steel insert, M-855 green-tip is not a true armor-piercing round. However, it can wreak havoc on reactive steel targets now seen with increasing frequency. It’s also not a hunting load, since it’ll act more like a drill in soft tissue. So, what’s it good for beyond hardened targets? From a civilian viewpoint, the M855 is mostly good for punching holes in paper.

M855 vs M193 – Which is Best?

As for which one is best? My choice is neither. Instead, I’ll be shopping for some good .223 loads. The first pick will be fairly affordable, and it’ll have much in common with M193.

(Video) Carbine Comparison: 5.56x45mm M855 and .223 Rem 55gr FMJ 16" Gel Test

M193 and M855 notes: One advantage to both loads is that they are waterproofed with sealed bullets and primers. The primers are also crimped into their pockets for fast-cycling reliability. When the chips are down they’ll function, which could be of paramount importance. The equivalent civilian version of M193 load is Federal’s 5.56 XM193, 55-grain American Eagle. Supposedly, it comes off the same line as similar military loads, sealed, with crimped primers.

.223 Remington Alternatives

Most shooters know the .223 Remington is a follow-up civilian version of the 5.56×45. Some consider the 5.56 and .223 loads interchangeable, but that’s really not the case. Of the two, a .223 has a tighter chamber. It’s also loaded to lower pressures. Thus, a roomier 5.56 chamber can safely fire a .223 Remington cartridge. But shooters who reverse this process can encounter unsafe chamber pressures!

If yours is a .223 chamber the decision becomes easy regarding M193 or M855. The correct choice is neither. No worries though. We can do better – even if you have a 5.56 NATO rifle.

Rather than fret over heavier bullets, how about going with one weight that can cover most needs through a common zero? For many of us, the needs will include plinking, defense, varmints, or possibly even deer (if lacking a larger caliber). Turns out, although considered light, carefully chosen 55-grain bullets can cover most. Today’s various rifling twists are also factored in.

.223 Practice, Plinking, and Even Small Game Loads

I’ve been using .223 Federal 55-grain American Eagle FMJ for years. It was my agency’s Q-load so I bought it by the ton (literally). It’s no more match-grade than other military-type loads, but it’ll cover most practice needs.

Our troops zero their Aimpoint-equipped 16” AR-15s at 50 yards, which puts them on the money again 200-yards. Rifled with 1:9 twists, these ARs average around 1.5–2 MOA. I’ve used the same AE FMJs in a European 12 Ga./.223 combination gun to pot the occasional small game dinner. Its 1:12 barrel is accurate enough (.75 MOA) to make head-shots. This load also shoots well in most 1:8 barrels.

M193 vs M855 vs .223 - Ballistics (4)

Just about every ammo manufacturer makes a 55-grain FMJ which is normally quite affordable. Of course, right now the hardest part is finding some.

.223 Varmints Below “Big Game” Status Loads

M193 vs M855 vs .223 - Ballistics (5)

One sure-fire way to determine a load’s effectiveness is to use it on our Northern New England coyotes. Because these hybrids run big and tough due to gray wolf genes, anchoring one can be a challenge. I was about to switch to a .243 when an tactical LE connection handed me a box of Federal 55-grain Ballistic Tip .223 rounds (I’ve procured it since in LE and sporting boxes).

(Video) AR-15 vs MEAT & BONE 🥩

Now, many tough coyotes later, I can vouch for the effectiveness of this load. Although some Nosler BT iterations are reputed to be fragile, this .223 version behaves more like a miniature big game load. It reliably piles up 50-pound coyotes (or bobcats) while leaving a classic exit hole.

This stuff is accurate, too! I’ve seen frequent 0.35 MOA from a 1:8 Wylde Chamber, and steady 0.6 MOA from a Remington HB M-700 rifled 1:9. The list goes on, too. If nothing else was available I’d use this bullet for deer, shooting – carefully. Based on trusted LE reports, it should also work well for defense.

Federal sells their 55-grain sporting version as “Varmint and Predator Nosler Ballistic Tip.” It’ll usually impact close to Federal’s 55-grain AE load, which is good considering its cost. Like other premium-type loads, a 20-round box could set you back $30.

M193 vs M855 vs .223 - Ballistics (6)

Light varmint note: I’ve fired vast quantities of .223 Hornady 55-grain TAP in 5.56 NATO, Wylde (hybrid), and .223 chambers. It’s my go-to load for maximum accuracy in various rifling twists. It also offers rapid expansion. During several prairie dog extravaganzas, sod poodles were break-dancing out to 500 yards. But, despite much low-angle shooting, ricochets were extremely rare – seemingly less so than .17 HMRs!

Hornady’s LE TAP load has a polymer tip and looks a lot like their varmint offerings. It could have some merit for defensive use in tight quarters where the main concern is overpenetration. But, for use against critters larger than foxes, I’ll go with a tougher bullet.

.223 Large Animal Loads

Instead of messing with a bullet insert, how about an all-metal projectile? Today’s solid-coppers offer the winning combination of extraordinary penetration, excellent expansion, and very good to stunning accuracy. Most of my experience involves Barnes TSX in various calibers.

Several years ago I was present for the testing of various handgun and rifle bullets, fired into gel-blocks, per FBI protocols. This event was hosted by a big-name ammunition manufacturer for LE firearms trainers. At its conclusion, a pair of end-to-end gel blocks were still sitting on a table so I broke out a box of Federal .223 55-grain Barnes TSX.

M193 vs M855 vs .223 - Ballistics (7)

At that time, monolithic bullets were less understood. The manufacturer had no equivalent product and several attending state crime lab techs had little experience with them. I wish we could’ve recovered the TSX shot, but for all I know, it’s still going having emerged (quite literally) as the day’s penetration champ. However, it did leave a classic expansion signature before drilling through both blocks – the only load to do so!

(Video) What is 5.56 Green Tip Ammo? (M855 vs M193)

Since then, I’ve witnessed similar results during formalized testing of Hornady’s similar 55-grain GMX solid-coppers. But, the majority of my experience pertains to deer; all cleanly harvested with Barnes TSX bullets in calibers ranging from .350 Rem Mag down to the small .300 Blackout (110 TAC-TX version). Absent are .223 reports. Out of all such loads available, this 55-grain solid-copper Barnes would be my pick for deer (or hogs). However, I just go to a larger caliber.

.223 Defense Loads

Regarding defense, the big concern for civilians could be excessive penetration. As for accuracy, Barnes TSX results can be phenomenal – usually. But, some barrels outright hate ‘em. A monolithic will be longer than an equivalent lead bullet so, theoretically, it should like faster twist rates. Maybe, but my 26-inch HB Remington M-700 .223 produced ½ MOA groups despite its 1:12 rifling.

My Wylde-chambered 1:8 did 1.25 MOA, still useful but not spectacular (I swear there’s some voodoo involved with twist rates). Anyhow, the proof is in the shooting. This stuff is expensive but, if POI is consistent with FMJs, you probably won’t need as many.

The big takeaway: Despite typically classic expansion, a solid-copper bullet like the Barnes retains nearly all of its mass for deep penetration. That kind of performance should bump you up at least one weight class, often without the need to re-zero. Assuming POI is consistent with other 55-grain loads, much of its cost can be amortized.

M193 vs M855 vs .223 - Ballistics (8)

Heavier bullet option: Check out Federal’s 60-grain Nosler Partition load. The bullet is well-proven choice for hunting, and the .223’s version shoots accurately in most rifling twists. It hammers big coyotes as well as a 55-grain Nosler BT and, for whitetails (or hogs), it could be the better choice.

M193 vs M855 vs .223 Alternatives Summary

Ever since its appearance, efforts have been underway to make the 5.56 NATO something it really isn’t; a reliable big game cartridge and decisive fight-stopper. Hence, the appearance of numerous 6.5s, the .30 AR, .350 Legend – and many others. But, bullet design does matter, and it is possible to give .224 projectiles a bump through carefully chosen projectiles.

Really, the M855 vs M193 debate should not be had without considering .223 alternatives.

High Power competitors have moved to VLD projectiles to boost downrange performance of their service-type ARs at 600 yards. These low-drag .224 bullets, being ultra-heavy, won’t stabilize without the fastest twist-rates. Although more wind resistant, good calls are still a product of experience. For the rest of us, 400 yards is a pretty good poke with anything, especially in a breeze.

Like many others, I enjoy ringing steel targets at much further distances – after a switch to a larger and more suitable caliber. Although I still get my share of marginal hits, the suffering is confined to a bruised ego.

(Video) 5 56 NATO Ammunition: XM193 55gr. vs M855 62gr.


1. M855 vs M193 short & sweet, what do you prefer?
(Primary Arms, LLC)
2. Buyer Beware: M193 vs "M193" 5.56 Ammo
3. Is .223 or 5.56 Better?
4. Test: Vietnam era M193 ball 1:12 twist vs. Modern M855 ball 1:7 twist
(Military Arms Channel)
5. The WORST AR-15 Ammo EVER!
(James Yeager)
6. What Type Of Ammo To Stockpile And Why
(Magic Prepper)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Jeremiah Abshire

Last Updated: 05/18/2023

Views: 5573

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (54 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jeremiah Abshire

Birthday: 1993-09-14

Address: Apt. 425 92748 Jannie Centers, Port Nikitaville, VT 82110

Phone: +8096210939894

Job: Lead Healthcare Manager

Hobby: Watching movies, Watching movies, Knapping, LARPing, Coffee roasting, Lacemaking, Gaming

Introduction: My name is Jeremiah Abshire, I am a outstanding, kind, clever, hilarious, curious, hilarious, outstanding person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.